How Apple Just Changed the Entire Industry (M1 Chip)

This wasn’t him. This was the result of a hacker group having a conversation with Steve Jobs before he passed away. This was us. Stop taking credit for our work and actions. We worked very hard to make our case to Mr. Jobs, and he agreed.

@Aleksandar MakedonskiWOW you made 95 comments on this video you must really hate Apple to the core what did Apple do to you

Let's not pretend that apple just don't want to leave ANY money on the table either. Soldering everything on the mobo is very ...Apple. No expensing route but to buy a WHOLE new computer from them, at a premium price of course. They are succeeding where Sony has failed.

Correct! I have a feeling Apple can read our brains. I always remember saying inside of my head to myself. “I wish my iPhone can unsend and or edit text messages”. NO LIE!!! Now here we are we are, we are now able to edit and unsend text messages.😳I’ll never forget saying next “how TF Apple knew this was in my brain as a wish!!??!!”😡

Yes considering your content these days is 90% worthless clickbait just for affiliate revenue its quite surprising.

@aG3nt oRanGe LOL... Thinking Scalable isn't in your vocabulary, Unless you consider AMD' infinity fab etc.. What happens when a server priced equivalent, at 1/10th the power draw happens? Ever better, A modular version? If that happens, and I may well might, You'd be saying by to x86... Its old, forked everywhere...... You may have a hat... still, but maybe, soon you won't. Remember , some of the first calculator chips had NO competition.... Think about it... Just sayin'

Indeed we are, from Intel and AMD. Not this Apple calculator chip.

@K.O.D. - He featured them in 'Person' he didn't steal contents from their channel

If there is a head of the head on a nail then you just hit it

innovation just means new concept or finding different ways.... it being easier or complicated has nothing to do with it

CISC made sense back when compiler optimization was primitive and it was assumed that all complex programs and OSes would be written in assembly,. Back in those days, an advanced CPU was expected to minimize the "semantic gap" between human programmers and assembly. So, the designers of the day weren't dumb or lacking in innovation, they were designing for a different goal.

IOW, “Less Is More”!

apple products are pricy, use newest tech, break more often faster, and have amasing usability, over all cost more and depending on the product you might not be able to do everything you want. android phones can be pricy depending on who makes them, they can have the newest unproven techm they can break easily and often, they can have amazing usability, the overall cost can be less while getting you everything you want to do. windows and linux computers are the same, and can get you everything you want to do, even for less money. apple isnt bad, but they make products i cant rely on. they make products that are flashy with tech people who buy them usally dont understand or use, and companies that make android phones like samsung do the same thing. computers of the linus and windows operating systems generally dont do that and if you need to you can easily change parts of them to make it fit your needs. i like to say the older companies with the less known products often do it best, motorola, say what you will about them, make better, cheaper, more relyable, and better for the consumer products then samsung or apple when it comes to phones, and its an android, so that would mean i say the best phones avalible are androids, thats what alot of people dont understand, its not always about the fact apple is bad and android phones are bad or whatever, its who makes it because android phones arent just one thing made by one company like iphones, apple doesnt have anyone who uses ios on phones for a reason, no one wants to work with them and they dont want to work with anyone else, and there monoply on there operating system and devices that use it is why there products get seen as so bad, there arent options for the consumers there stuff doesnt work for that use there systems.

@Cloud11 for gaming? probably. For work? maybe, but then we can just argue that using a feature phone is far better than a smartphone because we don't "really need that much power" on our phones

@William Young same things go with other brand products, too. I think you forgot the fact that technology evolves with time, lol

@Aleksandar Makedonski I don’t think apple products are “dumb”, also isn’t apple products literally outperforming every android phone out there, and the fact it last over 5 years vs 1 or even 2 years, i’m not defending apple but just saying the advantages of iphone over android.

@William Young its Foxconn products with apple logo and dumb customers will buy it 😂

@eurosonly never seen anyone say that. They have industry leading battery life.

And yet people still say their iPhone has horrible battery life.

We’ve already seen it, with the death of the headphone jack (which I admittedly don’t miss but it would be nice for people who do), and the lack of micro sd slots on some newer phones

So much fun reading those comments. Guys, I hate apple, I got into ugly arguments with my friends multiple times. But I got recently (3 weeks ago) a company M1 Air from 2020 for iOS development bcs, apple does not allow to develop iOS apps without xcode (another reason I hate apple). I have a Dell XPS 15" i7 16 gigs of ram, dedicated GPU which I bought for 2300€ and the M1 Air which costed 1600€. Guess what? Despite of my hatred to apple, the M1 beats that XPS in every aspect except when it comes down to games. 15" XPS OLED 2019: - Battery life: 3-4 hours working in "power saving mode" - Heat: Hot to touch, too hot to be on my lap or any surface that blocks air from ventilating - Good performance (when plugged in and not in power saving mode) M1 Air 2020: - Battery life: 10-14 hours of work in what ever mode is by default if it's even possible to use some low power mode on a ARM chip - Heat: Always cold / room temperature, I can put it anywhere, anytime - Same level of performance when it comes to work (except gaming) So which one is do you think more productive, comfortable and cheaper? Energy prices are high, these times, what is cheaper to use? The m1 that barely uses any energy or the XPS with i7 which I can cook scrambled eggs on it? When you buy a laptop, how often do you upgrade the cpu? never. gpu? never. HDD to SSD? now days nearly never because they are already fast (and the macs for long run have faster SSDs as any other non-mac product) When it comes down to performance, the M1 can do 90% I do on a laptop for work (android, ios apps, web apps, php sites) as fast as it can do my XPS it's using massively less energy to do it so there is no "low battery anxiety" anymore, it's easier to carry it, does not burn my hand/legs,... it's clear winner for me for work. While it costs less to buy and reduces electricity bills. And if I want to game I just got a gaming PC which for the same price as a gaming laptop will out perform any gaming laptop.

@Kurb Najung Lmao. not even close. Apples CPUs perform faster and use way less power than equivalently sized Intel CPUs. This is a hard fact brother.

The new ARM processors used in Apple are using the same old tech Intel used to integrate graphics into the CPU. So Apple is about 12 years late, but you claim isn't killing Intel? Well AMD is forcing Intel to innovate, but Apple isn't even in the same league as x86.

One year on and Intels 13th gen is faster and cheaper than AMDs latest ZEN CPU. It seems that the sleeping giant awoke!

@BlueCarbon Stop, it's already dead!!!

Would love to hear more of your thoughts on this!

What would have been the most challenging hurdle they would have faced in desigining the M1 chip?

Second risc, first time didn't end well.

@David Wiles Yes, RISC invented by IBM BTW....in the 1970's, about the same time Neural Networks were first worked on...just didn't have the computing power....yet...

*The first prototype computer to use reduced instruction set computer (RISC) architecture* *was designed by IBM researcher John Cocke and his team in the late 1970s. For his* *efforts,* Cocke received the Turing Award in 1987, the US National Medal of Science in* *1994, and the US National Medal of Technology in 1991.*

@David Wiles agreed

🤓😂😂😂😂

Not really. Once they reach the same voltage as x86 and try to perform as well as x86 in gaming or other fields where ARM does not play well (basically anything else besides media), they're actually worse at power management. Minecraft recently dropped full ARM support, fastest M chip performs just as good as a 10 year old PC.

Not anymore, I have everything I need installed right now

@Justin Wyllie lol what are you smoking: the risen 9 3900xt has a slightly lower geekbench score than my 16 inch base model 10 core M1. Oh and it’s a desktop cpu and draws 105watts

The m1 Mac is a good deal only when compared to another Mac and looking at power draw. It's equivalent to a 6 core ryzen 5. Those are like $300 dollars

@FullFledged2010 I never said that. In all likelihood, the Apple Silicon chips will be more expensive to make than x86 chips because of the ginormous cache they’ve allocated. The difference is Apple makes profit from the final product, not the chips, while Intel, AMD, and Qualcomm need to do so, so Apple can afford to make those trade offs.

@Shane P. What makes you think the m1 chip is cheaper to produce than x86? Its about the same size die and on 5nm. Sure the power circuit could be cheaper but i highly doubt that would the actual laptop any cheaper 😑

Celeron rulez!!!

Why is everyone talking as if nobody is going to buy Intel products again? Remember those chips will not be sold to any other company. The vast majority of people in low income countries still use windows. I can't afford an apple product so is inmaterial to me . Won't benefit in anyway since they would be found in only apple products.

meow meow meow

​@Tremor244 I would like a citation on that thirty times more power consumption, that would melt any cpu in an instant and burn down your house.

I think this will make VM take off.

Intel is not doing well recently, AMD also has sone better last yeats

@Well Prophet!

@aG3nt oRanGe His comment aged like fine wine. Yours on the other hand...

Not really

@Well I love how well your comment ages😂❤️

@Omar Oh it's good. But you won't see it paired with a GPU any time soon. And it won't be able to match that performance alone. FACT. Does that sound less fan boy for you.

Apparently PA was also building an evolved form of PowerPC that was more powerful yet consumed less power than the G5. The problem is that it would have took too long, so Apple went with Intel instead, although said evolved PowerPC CPU was used in the AmigaOne X1000.

@Quantum Infinity they just released, you guessed it, an incredibly power hungry hot chip! Big surprise! Barely beating the m1 while drawing 130 watts: they just won’t learn

Intel hasn't really launched a direct competitor to the M1 yet in the lower power categories, so we wont know until their later chips come out they said that are supposed to be more of a direct competitor.

@DaX Nah, TV will be dead sooner rather than later. Kids these days don't want sitcoms or dramas. They barely have the attention span necessary to watch TikToks...

@Tyler Melton I think you just destroyed a small part of that man's soul. Lol

@Bobby Blondino this is not apple related channel or related to any company. he is just talking about how ARM chips are changing the industry. now apple comes into the discussion because they did make good quality ARM chips better than intel's X86 architecture. if you had watched his other videos then you would understand it is not a channel related to any company.

@T. R. speaking of old people and TV I turn 65 in a month. I cut the cable nearly 20 years ago and got a Roku. A few years back I realized I was using my tablet and not my 55 inch 4K TV and got rid of it. Generally people my age still watch TV but generalization in claims is bias. Also my dad just turned 87. Both of us are planning on being around a while.

I DON'T watch hardly anything on classic TV anymore. What I do, like PBS reports, I watch on my phone

No

@“laissez faire” yeah that's fair, I'm drawn to both apple and amd for different reasons, each has their own strengths

@Haydo funny enough, my son got the new i9 and it’s faster than my M1 max. But my M1 max still feels snappy while I’m editing so it I’m happy.

... fan spools up

@Waynegro I agree but you could’ve told apple the same thing a few years back and now here we are with the M1 and the new ones coming out.

It’s been necessary for 6 years

@higgs ocnyou're full of it.

@Deckard 5 Pegasus > Actually it does not even matter now. Intel is so far behind everyone, they alreadly lost. Even in the CISC architecture AMD is killing Intel. And in RISC, Intel is in the stone age with absolutely nothing to compete with any ARM, let alone an Apple M1 chip. Try to educate yourself at least a little bit before posting nonsense. Learning the differences between CISC, RISC and ARM, e.g. hardware memory models, would be a good start. Learning the history of Intel would be a good start too before claiming them dead. Read "Only the Paranoid Survive" by Andy Grove.

Unfortunately, this video really misinterprets the history of computer chips designs by starting it with Intel and ARM =(

There are so many problems with this comment. "The Apple A12 etc aren't really ARM any more" - There are no true "ARM" chips. ARM only licenses out the IP and doesn't fabricate, nor design any chips, and all 3rd party manufactures make there own version, with their own additional enhanced add on instructions sets. Thus A12 is as much an ARM chip as anyother chip claiming to be "ARM". "ARM which remains a general purpose processor that can function in IoT," - Again there are NO "general purpose" ARM chips. Every single manufacturer of "ARM" chips is making their own custom version. "ARM which is optimised for iPhone/iPad " - As written is not correct. More correctly said It is optimized for the iOS and the OSX software. This is exactly the same with Microsoft Windows and the drivers made for Windows systems because of closed door agreements. And why much hardware is better supported and works with less gitches on Windows than on Linux. This statement applies to all of the IT industry, and really says nothing new. "When they get to 5nm like M1...then there will be a like-for-like comparison" - Actually it does not even matter now. Intel is so far behind everyone, they alreadly lost. Even in the CISC architecture AMD is killing Intel. And in RISC, Intel is in the stone age with absolutely nothing to compete with any ARM, let alone an Apple M1 chip.

Once you bite (the apple), you’re bitten (entranced).

One of the mistakes Microsoft made with Windows was to overload the start-up sequence with too much unnecessary housekeeping. When Apple adopted BSD UNIX for their OS kernel, they did just the opposite....keep the launch sequence uncluttered -- get the desktop up & running in as few seconds as possible.

Engineers behind all grindings can only watch from the side.. Shout out to all my co-physical and electronic chip designers all over the world.. Litterally sweat and blood.. And TSMC making all chips materialize.. Hoping the China invasion won't ever happen, but as many says.. No one knows the future..

@pjoh7 no

@Aleksandar Makedonski No its not like that. They can shift to GF if they want.

@Subhajit Chatterjee behind samsung apple cant made any cpu they biy finised products feom tmsc and selling like apple silicone 😂

Intel's neweest Desktop chips stomp M1 into the ground in terms of computational power and efficiency. Their upcoming mobile chips won't be too far behind, I can assure you about that.

Especially now. New chips are mad

@TheLonelyOwl 265 they still are very much at the top and have an enormous amount of capital. If they get an efficient chip out in time, I’d argue they can stay at the top of the market. Apple doesn’t care about competing with intel since Apple will never build a chip for windows, so intel still has a chance.

Ibm has already 2nm chip so they dint ha e to worry lol

meow meow meow

No the arm chips in smartphones do not run off “residual power” only that early prototype. Additionally cold fusion was incorrect saying the arm chip ran of “residual power” it was running of the power from the instructions being sent to it (which is still incredibly mind blowing)

yeah, SSDs should've been fitted to PCs a lot earlier than they were, like as far back as 2009 or so, shame they were so expensive for long after that.

@Domenic Keller I think you meant the comment for sci fifaan. I think compilers are a good thing, and lots of projects would be too difficult and big to manage in assembly, never mind cope with vast amount of hardware out there. Even programming in VBA can seem overly tedious. Role on AI. There is a role for selectively doing some parts of programs in pure assembly depending on the speed of operation and bottlenecks faced.

@Tarun Arya this is not the whole truth. C compilers will take the CPU Architektur into account while you have to be extremely knowledgeable and have to spend a shit tone of time to get to that point. Your average programmer has no chance to get close to a good c compiler.

Well of course no widely-produced Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) is as ugly and outright *klugey* as Intel's x86, but... is even the latest ARM ISA as sweet, and so completely *orthogonal,* as that of the ADSP-2100 family? Admittedly a fixed-point DSP, NOT a general purpose CPU, it can be used as a microcontroller in many cases, and almost makes you want to eschew the C compiler and do it all in assembly.

I had done a bit C64 assembly back in the days, and a bit AVR 8-bit code during studies. But when I came to my first ARM7 project, I remember that I was also stunned by the elegance of the instructions, e.g. the shifting bits. I felt that this was a completely higher philosophy of thinking, and I liked their approach from the first moment. Now I have just bought my first Apple Computer, and as a Linux guy, this was entirely because it's just great technology.

Assembly was always screamingly fast be it ARM or any other. There always has been nothing as good as direct assembly code. It has just been less necessary as the chips got faster and there was more memory for lots of everyday applications. It has also been complicated by needing to have your software allow for different peoples machines with different software and hardware setups especially where there are multiple manufacturers -ie non-apple. But I agree re native power being unleashed by assembly.

uhh after some time intel won't have money to buy pants, i mean someone give intel the world record for making chips the hottest chips.

AMD has competed with intel for years, and since the previous gen they have been the top choice for most users. Intel really got complacent over the years and it shows.

@Evacody124 stuck in thinking of the past

@Evacody124 I am not talking about whether or not Apple is competing with intel or AMD, or in fact, if they are competing with anyone at all. I was just saying that, when I commented, Apple had created the fastest consumer CPU in the world ever made. The fact of it running MacOS is irrelevant. But, for the record, you can run Windows in a Parallels or VMWare Fusion virtual machine and get close to native speeds. I'm really not sure what you're trying to say with "Apple will never catch up to Microsoft or intel or AMD or Nvidia with what they are doing." Catching up in what sense? Because if we're talking about the speed from optimization of software and hardware, Apple destroys all of those companies. Literally a DaVinci Resolve video export is faster on an M1 Ultra Mac Studio than on a tricked-out RTX 3090 + intel core i9 desktop Windows PC.

@Random One for Stuff 🤦‍♂️ dude just no Apple is no competition for Windows nor is it to Intel or AMD. Apple is the only company that makes the computers that run MacOS. Name me a nother company that builds computers that runs MacOS. I can't going to a Best Buy or Microcenter and by there M1 chip to put in a computer. You can with Intel and AMD. Apple will never catchup to Microsoft or Intel or AMD or Nvidia wight what they are doing. Apple is a niche market in the computer world.

@Loading Forever LOL what?!?!??!?)!?) hackintoshes were notoriously difficult. And now with the m1 you can get more power for cheaper buying apple than making a hackintosh. You don’t know what you are talking about

@John Smith you would have been 100% before the M1. Who thought apple would be the best bang for your buck and sell an overpowered beast

@petruk resing not really, they’re reasonably priced

Don't do that

@Rob Ch. 10 months later I see this. While sq2 itself was quite not up to what I expected, Qualcomm do have a plan to catch up. More competition is only better.

@RWL2012 👏👏

@Rarefaction *They don't mention Sophie Wilson who was the real brains behind ARM architecture.

@Gregory Malchuk No fancy pipeline either, but we did think about it doing it. We had 24 instructions in total; 6 of them being load and store instructions, 9 data manipulation instructions and 9 Jump and branch instructions I really recommend this YT series it's very very very long(150 or so videos). But you will come out of it with a complete understanding of Processor design: brvid.net/group/PL643xA3Ie_Et2uM4xu1yFk-A5ZQQ8gQ5e Otherwise, the books we used for our project was: FPGA protyping by VHDL examples by Pong P. Chu. (ISBN: 0-13-148521-0) Computer Systems - A Programmer's Perspective by Randal E. Bryant, David R. O'Hallaron (ISBN: 1-292-10176-8) Structured Computer Organization by Andrew S. Tanenbaum (ISBN:0-13-148521-0) Introduction to Logic Circuit and Logic Design with VHDL by Brock J. LaMeres (ISBN: 978-3-319-34195-8)

@Pioneerz Ahh. What was total number of instructions? Was it pipelined? Do you have any recommended books on the subject?

@Gregory Malchuk Indeed, but it’s not computer science that I study. It’s Electronics engineering; it was to go along with the theme of our 4th semester. which was digital design coming from 3rd being about analog. So we got an FPGA and our fingers into Verilog and programmed our own custom CPU with our own very very simple instruction set. With instructions as: add, subtract, fetch data from address in memory, and a few more. No interrupts though, but it could be implemented if we had more time. Learned a lot from that project, but that cpu design in essence wasn’t much different from CPUs in the 80s. Today’s processors got all types of fancy things like branch predicting and parallel processing and FPUs(ours only had an ALU) and more that I haven’t looked that much into yet😊

Not really, the were windows laptops that used ARM chips from Qualcomm before M1. Also Raspberry Pi runs linux on a smartphone ARM chip. None of them were a really desktop worthy chip and were not great performers. It was apple silicon team that has been able to do a great viable chip first. They hired all the best engineers and made something that blows away existing laptops. Qualcomm Snapdragon will get there soon, they are always a couple of years behind apple.

@klo schuessel ...which is why you don't get them on Apple products even if they do have Intel inside..

ha ha

And I think it's safe for you to copy this comment without the original writer know about this

@Zoura hey definitely can power potatoes very well.

These stickers... i hate them

You can say that Apple took the RISC.

I agree. This seems like documentary making rather than a You Tube tech review.

@Russell not really, Apple optimization only for Apple and AMD and Nvidia has to optimization for every newer PC knew to humankind

Actually Intel has been very active, they stopped microsoft releasing arm laptops a decade ago, thats right a decade ago Microsoft had arm laptops made by qualcomm working fully. Intel stopped them.

They literally did not add any value to their i7 for a decade and even i9 is just modification of i7. And yes intel is surely doing something wrong. Also if google make their quantum computer available for commercial use. I think it will be end of intel.

@Aman Agarwal Wow, tell me you're stupid without telling me you're stupid. SoC's in phones and tablets (laptops don't use SoCs) also have the memory integrated, and that's just one difference.

You usually pay with being subject to ads, but alas it's sort of free... for now... make sure to educate yourself and others about net neutrality! The fight isn't over yet!

@carso1500 "It isn't really free" followed by "you only need to pay" are "basically the same" statement problem condition. What @DDD _really_ meant to say was, "Nah dude, not free at all!".

*2* *JNostro* Agreed. Me Too. But, that also means the _"Cat's out of the Bag"_ on something new! During my *New* *Wave* Entry Years on *Melrose* Ave as a Costumer, it was absolutely thrilling and exciting to see my Fashion Goods hung in the Boutique Store Windows there as I drove by. But this also meant my cool fashion idea was set loose and up for grabs to knock-off artists going forward. Thus I'd return home and rapidly start working on designing the next best thing. _".....ooh..wait..wait.. I just fired up an Opera Browser. Apple just announced M2 in a surprised Twit to Mcrosoft! (just kidding, but you know how this shlit goes)."_

totally not free ...sheeple pay by watching ads, while the rest of us are being manipulated by targeted video suggestions, that is something that is impossible to put label on but totally can change where countries are heading.

for some reason I just don't care about M1 and keep buying intel's desktop. The major innovation is they integrated RAM into the CPU.

Solid statements. But you lost me at quantum CPU they require way too much error correction and have to operate in heavily controlled environments. Anything as much as a bump of the table could throw calculations off completely. Quantum computing will become really useful in about 20 years

well to be fair, Apple has disrupted markets in the past. they disrupted the music industry with the ipod and itunes (making buying music disks obsolete), then they disrupted the mobile market with the iphone. so they do have their credit in innovation. they are about to disrupt the market yet again, this time the CPU market. in 5 years from now we will see most laptops and desktops using ARM