Can We Throw Satellites to Space? - SpinLaunch

Real Engineering
Visualizações 2 189 425
99% 77 000 1

Take the Real Engineering X Brilliant Course and get 20% off your an annual subscription:

Watch this video ad free on Nebula:

Links to everything I do:

Get your Real Engineering shirts at:

Writer/Narrator: Brian McManus
Editor: Dylan Hennessy
Animator: Mike Ridolfi
Animator: Eli Prenten
Modelling: Sam Carter
Sound: Graham Haerther
Henry Ariza - Camera Operator and Color
Jamon Tolbert - Camera Operator
Gina Giorgi - Production Coordinator
Donovan Bullen - Music
Thumbnail: Simon Buckmaster

Select imagery/video supplied by Getty Images
Thank you to AP Archive for access to their archival footage.

Music by Epidemic Sound:

Thank you to my patreon supporters: Adam Flohr, Henning Basma, Hank Green, William Leu, Tristan Edwards, Ian Dundore, John & Becki Johnston. Nevin Spoljaric, Jason Clark, Thomas Barth, Johnny MacDonald, Stephen Foland, Alfred Holzheu, Abdulrahman Abdulaziz Binghaith, Brent Higgins, Dexter Appleberry, Alex Pavek, Marko Hirsch, Mikkel Johansen, Hibiyi Mori. Viktor Józsa, Ron Hochsprung

Ciência e tecnologia

Publicado em


5 Ago 2022



Baixar vídeos:

Carregando o link.....

Adicionar a:

Minha playlist
Assista mais tarde
Comentários 12 127
Real Engineering
Real Engineering Mês atrás
This has been in the works for about 3 months now. Our first full documentary shoot. There is a lot of negativity in the comments from people who have not even watched the video yet. This channel is about being positive about engineering. Encouraging and inspiring the next generation of engineers. If you are looking for a channel that focuses on being negative and adds nothing to world, you have come to the wrong place. It's so much easier to point out what's hard, than using your brain to think of solutions. That's not what engineers do. We find problems, and then we find solutions. If you don't think a company that's trying to throw satellites into space, and has already built a 1/3rd prototype, isn't insanely cool. I don't know what to do for ye. That's badass. Whether they succeed or not is irrelevant. It's not your investment money they are using, chill out.
Nico H
Nico H 23 dias atrás
What an absurd comment.. “not your money”? You know how government funding works? “If you are looking for a channel that focuses on being negative and adds nothing to the world”.. yeah ok, because being realistic and tackling the ACTUAL ENGINEERING problems doesn’t add anything? I mean common, that’s the root of engineering: understanding the problems and working around them. But just ignoring the problems and dismissing them as negative and pointless (with a clear jab at a certain someone (because that’s positive)) is absurd. Strike one for not acknowledging any of this in your video (which ok, we all make mistakes), strike two for then childishly doubling down, when faced with a counter argument, instead of addressing it. The concept is awesome. Ignoring it’s flaws and dismissing them as pointless negativity is childish.
joshua herbert
joshua herbert Mês atrás
Hope it goes well
Gökay Haydar Baykuş
@Ethan Dowdy if an engineering concept is fundamentally flawed then there is no need to go for a trial and error phase. No one is luckier than basic math.
Carl Piper Larsen
Carl Piper Larsen Mês atrás
Gökay Haydar Baykuş
Engineering is about designing according to the laws of nature. If your design isn't compliant with these laws, then it doesn't work. Critique is not Criticism
Mr Mike
Mr Mike Mês atrás
Oh wow. I love this new format! Great to see you on camera. The quality of this documentary reminds me of the Discovery channel when I was a kid... way back before it got overtaken by reality shows.
Jason Ward
Jason Ward 19 dias atrás
@CrankyPants oh man, I really set you off! I definitely didn't mean to push anyone's buttons! I didn't mean to put anyone down. But it seems like you're looking for a reason to be "cranky." I hope you can have a better day tomorrow and not let positive comments from random internet people upset you too much...
CrankyPants 20 dias atrás
@Jason Ward You really assumed that he was “super ugly because he just spoke”? Really? What kind of immature, petty mind comes up with that? We hear him speak because he’s always displaying awesome video and/or excellent graphics that are integral to the video's content. If you paid attention to his videos, you’d see where it would make more sense and be informative to display the relevant graphics than wave a flag with his face throughout the videos just to prove to everyone that he isn’t “super ugly”. That really floors me that you assumed that if people don't display their faces, they must be really ugly, much less wrote it for everyone to see.
KRIZINKGRIN INC 25 dias atrás
Impressive it's different tech but it reminds me of a rail gun because amazing speed is involved when projectile is in motion.👊🏽⚡
Flynnick 28 dias atrás
Supercharger not turbo...
Yarpen Zigrin
Yarpen Zigrin 28 dias atrás
Too bad it's a complete lie.
Vaughn Kingston
Vaughn Kingston Mês atrás
Makes one appreciate writers like Jules Verne who were ahead of their time.
Samson Soturian
Samson Soturian 11 dias atrás
@Vaughn Kingston no, there was space travel books before that. Edgar Allan Poe wrote one involving a giant balloon and a wonder material lighter than hydrogen.
Vaughn Kingston
Vaughn Kingston 11 dias atrás
Wow reading some of the comments. Jules Verne came up with an idea of "space transportation" in a time when the light bulb was just coming online. Get a life and spend that time an energy being someone who can inspire and innovate rather than just 🧌 troll. LoL
Spin Launch is so stressful!!! Just look at what it did to the poor guy @ 8:24 ... Now look at him @ 36:30 !!! At this rate, he'll be ☠️ soon...
Samson Soturian
Samson Soturian 15 dias atrás
He wrote of a giant gun, and none of the methods he described would actually work.
Yarpen Zigrin
Yarpen Zigrin 25 dias atrás
@jama211 Learn science. This is a failed idea.
G4all Mês atrás
If this works, it could be a good cost-saving measure for moving small amounts of cargo. If it doesn't, the technology and lessons learned could be used for other things in the future. Things don't always translate from paper to the real world so easily. So if the stuff fail (not saying it will) the data provided from the practical application could inform other engineers of potential issues with their designs so they can work on how solve them. Either way, it's nothing but a good thing someone is even trying this whether it works or not.
nobody nowhere
nobody nowhere 12 horas atrás
really small amounts, if it had max load capacity of 2kg.
MiF 3 dias atrás
The payload would literally get destroyed at this G forces, your products would look like a pancake when arriving at its destination.
Carlos Garcia Cabral
Carlos Garcia Cabral 7 dias atrás
It won’t work.
Glenn Taylor
Glenn Taylor 10 dias atrás
If it had any chance of working NASA would throw money at it. Is that happening ? "crickets"
Ben Goldberg
Ben Goldberg Mês atrás
On the subject of regenerative braking, I could imagine having two spin launch devices close to one another, and slowing one down to speed up the other.
Eicy Dee
Eicy Dee 17 dias atrás
@gdutfulkbhh That's an interesting point. There would be a few ways for this. One would be using water as a counterweight. And dumping it it somewhat evenly during at least one turn of the rotor to not damage the vacuum chamber by the impact of the water. May not work, though. And dumping water into a vacuum chamber is less than ideal. Another one would be having a very fast mechanism that corrects the imbalance. Like some weights moving to the outside of the rotor, to where the capsule was. Has the problem that these objects are also accleerated, putting massive local stress on the arm and the bearings of the moving weights. The in my point of view most likely option seems counter-intuitive: Just accept the imbalance and build the structure to handle it. From a physics standpoint, the only thing changing is that the 100000 tons of force is not exerted to the aeroshell anymore, but to the bearings of the rotor. As long as they and the mouinting structure can hold these forces, an imbalanced rotor won't cause any damage. Or more as a joke: Just use a second capsule as a counterweight and add another launch door. This will also be launched at the same moment, but with Mach 6 straight into the ground. One may fill it with stuff one really wants to get rid of, nuclear waste may be a bad idea, though.
gdutfulkbhh 23 dias atrás
A considerable waste of energy will come from whatever you do with the counterweight that you have to jettison at the same moment that you launch your spacecraft. (If you don’t do that, your rotor arm will destroy itself and the facility.) If you can recover the energy imparted to the counterweight, it would be worth doing. I still think this won’t progress beyond hosing down the investors, though.
ardvark84 28 dias atrás
@Rusty Shakleford No.
Rusty Shakleford
Rusty Shakleford 28 dias atrás
@ardvark84 So you"re saying we need to spin a tesla into space and test its regenerative braking to get to the bottom of this?
Paul MacMartin
Paul MacMartin 29 dias atrás
Great walkthrough, given some of the access restrictions you faced. I had trouble following the various equations toward the end of the video, but your animations are great. What animation software do you use? Is it something like Blender?
Jesus Christ
Jesus Christ Mês atrás
You never disappoint me. This was a glorious video! Thank you.
Generical FishTycoon
@Jesus Christ Can you ask your old man what is going on with David's chin in this video. I can't turn the other cheek on this one, literally, like I physically can't stop staring dumbfounded. I need answers and ice water in this hell.
Generical FishTycoon
@Real Engineering I could not stop staring at David's chin, or rather a lack there of. I was genuinely unable to look away in disbelief. Can we get Jesus back in the thread? I think I need help.
• they call me a space hamster • 17 yrs ago
@Billy Joe oof good question. First, make sure no fingerprints. Then, maybe the local landfill?? The desert? Make sure nobody sees you coming or going. As I said, Jesus will understand. What you're doing serves the greater good. It's all part of the great circle of life.
Billy Joe
Billy Joe Mês atrás
@• they call me a space hamster • 17 yrs ago Where do I hide the body? He's in the trunk of my car right now
Sean Mês atrás
Honestly I want to see their full size launcher and them to get a rocket into orbit, and in that vein, when will they have an actual launch?
tapalmer99 29 dias atrás
The g-force involved in these - 10,000 g's - was dealt with back in world war II with proximity fuses in artillery shells which are probably pretty similar being shot out of a 5 inch barrel from 0 to several thousand feet per second is pretty much the same thing they're doing hence the 10,000g-force but was dealt with a long time ago by much less computationally aided people It's amazing what we used to do with just a slide rule looking at this up to and including put a man on the moon absolutely amazing
joe biddle
joe biddle Mês atrás
Thank you so much for this. It’s amazing to get some real data that shows this is actually possible! I’ve always wondered why we haven’t found another way to get a ship in motion and omit the need for the first stage. Virgin galactic sort of. 🤔 Best of luck to this team, I really hope they can pull this off x
Rhian Taylor
Rhian Taylor Mês atrás
So I guess this would be the "David" to "Falcon Heavy" as Goliath... I recall seeing this essential format in Popular Mechanics back in the late 1950's/early 60's - they suggested it could form the basis of a military field gun as launching satellites wasn't a big thing back then.
Humtog Mês atrás
This type of launch system was something that was in my mind since I was a 5th grader. I drew designs like these on paper with the dream to reduce the cost of launches. Another idea was basically a longer more powerful rail-gun. When I reached college, I did some calculations and came to a conclusion that it is not as feasible as I once thought it would be, and dropped that idea. Now, I am pleasantly surprised with someone attempting to make it happen against all odds & trying to push engineering to the limits! Only thing that didn't make sense was the cost per launch. How is this still more costly than the Falcon Heavy? This system cannot carry delicate stuff but the thing is If we are going to be an interplanetary civilization, we would need something to carry large amount of "dumb payload" like fuel, water, food and even construction material. But, I really thought the cost would be significantly lower as otherwise this thing is not really useful for those kinda dumb payload if Falcon heavy is able to carry it cheaper, thus rendering this only useful to launch super-hardened satellites that require specific orbits. But still, great to see someone try! Regardless of if this succeeds or not, it will be a great experiment to see. And, congrats on your first full documentary, it was very good, and kept my attention till the end. Way better than most Discovery documentaries these days.
Corzappy 6 dias atrás
Despite the fact it can't launch massive payloads, this system would still be insanely useful for countless things since right now even small payloads require big and expensive rockets.
QuesoCookies 2 dias atrás
Would love seeing this in combination with something like a space hook, so no rocket fuel or stages are spent at all. The boogeyman of our getting trapped on our planet if too much debris fills low orbit gets even scarier the more companies get in on the satellite game, so single-stage (or as the case may be zero-stage) to orbit capabilities are always looking attractive to me.
Zaydey Prime
Zaydey Prime 18 dias atrás
The moment the true-scaled launch succeeds, I'm guessing that people will start asking "how big can we scale it until it cannot go any further"
sean pelletier
sean pelletier Mês atrás
nice idea to launch a second vehicle 180 degrees after the first, has anyone considered (modeled) the velocity of projectile #1 vs the velocity of projectile #2 that will be travelling in the turbulence or even partial vacuum created by projectile #1? I think if that were modeled properly, you may find a collision in every case.
Velizar Nikolov
Velizar Nikolov 13 dias atrás
Can someone explain to me ..... what should be the payload of that rocket , that can handle 10,000g ! I mean .... doesn't the things inside the rocket need to be exceptionally strong too ... just like the tether ? Because that means that the things inside it ,will be also 10,000 times heavier than their weight on the surface of the earth right? would that turn everything inside into a blended soup of things ? how does that works?🤯🤯🤯
Johnny Repine
Johnny Repine Mês atrás
I would love to see something like this built on the moon for launching unmanned missions further into space.
SILVER WISKERS 20 dias atrás
Yarpen Zigrin
Yarpen Zigrin 28 dias atrás
@Leon Schuit You don't need to keep the dust out, there's no atmosphere.
Audio Phoenix
Audio Phoenix 29 dias atrás
@Leon Schuit probably just a membrane that can be punched through to keep the dust out. No need for a heavy door that keeps the negative pressure.
Simão Couto
Simão Couto Mês atrás
Yeah just send all the materials to build it. And theeeeennn the bloody aero crafts. Solving 0 problems lol
Yuuto Nosuri
Yuuto Nosuri Mês atrás
Wernher von Braun the real star trek guy ;p
Zakeriusiii 28 dias atrás
As always, great video really well scripted and interesting run through an amazing project. Thanks!
babblebam 22 dias atrás
I wonder if they have taken into account Earth’s rotation. The tether is basically a gyroscope willing to maintain its spinning axis. As Earth rotates, there will be an increased pressure on the bearing.
Jisper Plomp
Jisper Plomp 18 dias atrás
Oooh very true, but the weight of the structure is very light right? So maybe the effect is not that large
Son of Liberty
Son of Liberty Mês atrás
Very cool, very impressive. If I got the numbers right, you're talking a tether capable of lifting an aircraft carrier.
Donald Parker
Donald Parker Mês atrás
Does this become more interesting as a permanent moon based lauch facility? Maybe for Mars too (lower G and much less dense atmosphere). It would be interesting to see a feasibility assessment.
mcchristenson 28 dias atrás
Now that seems more reasonable than achieving this on earth.
Dave Fish
Dave Fish Mês atrás
Yeah... if we had a permanent moon base where they made satellites :D
GoldLöckchen Mês atrás
5:35 "SpinLaunch aims to YEET its aeroshell..." It's so simple, yet so incredibly funny.
Samuel LP
Samuel LP Mês atrás
Yeah I was like whhhat??
Supermemerboi Mês atrás
See, the secret of the spin launch technology isn’t a crazy spinning arm, it’s ACTUALLY just a guy in a circular chamber screaming YEET at the top of his lungs and throwing rockets into space
John John
John John Mês atrás
The sonic boom makes it more funnier to me 😆
David Blair
David Blair Mês atrás
I came for a YEET reference and I was not disappointed.
i2awi Mês atrás
I'm so glad others noticed that!
Dream Catcher
Dream Catcher 6 dias atrás
I am not from engineering background but the kind of engineering & technology they are putting into this is absolutely mind boggling. I am totally engrossed.
jbirdmax 10 dias atrás
WOW! What an incredibly professional, entertaining, and for mechanically inclined minds, gripping and informative documentary. Very well done! Bravo 👏
Peter Johnson
Peter Johnson 20 dias atrás
Thank you for all the work you put in to make this video. It's very illuminating, didactic and high quality.
Abd Rahman
Abd Rahman 14 dias atrás
Theoretically it's an interesting solution, but when it comes to actually launching satellites containing electronic and mechanical components, the doubt I have is how they can withstand the acceleration due to rotation before the launch ?
Shadow Cat
Shadow Cat Mês atrás
This launch system will really find use when launching from airless moons.
William Perry
William Perry Mês atrás
Yes, that's the only way this could work. Shooting compressed molten balls of carbon fiber from earth isn't possible
no u
no u Mês atrás
69th reply
_picklesticks Mês atrás
how are you getting there?
TheRainHarvester Mês atrás
@Christopher Spotts you're right! I was just being comical.
Christopher Spotts
Christopher Spotts Mês atrás
@TheRainHarvester I'm not sure what you're answering with that one word as I replied several times in this thread, but passengers really are the least of our worries with regard to space travel in the next few decades. Any form of infrastructure in space is going to be *far* more cargo-centric than human-centric. If you can lift everything with a kinetic system like SpinLaunch it's pretty trivial to send a pod with people up after, and probably far more cost effective than developing a space elevator would be.
Jaidev Jamwal
Jaidev Jamwal 9 dias atrás
Truly a pathbreaking launch mode. I hope they succeed.
Kevin Russell
Kevin Russell 10 dias atrás
If they pull this off, it will be such an incredible breakthrough. Fortune favours the brave. Good luck.
Kyal Snell
Kyal Snell 2 dias atrás
I really love watching this content and I and really interested in it. Im still a high school student but I was wondering what sort of university course I would have to do to get more involved in this sort of stuff.
SP4CEBAR Mês atrás
To get perfect vacuum you'd need the DVD logo molecules to bounce perfectly into the edge of the tank
Gianluca Rossi
Gianluca Rossi Mês atrás
The in depth discussion about vacuum pumps was fantastic!
Kent Slocum
Kent Slocum Mês atrás
@Ddub1083 I understand. However, the trees in the render didn't look like Southern California.
Ddub1083 Mês atrás
@Kent Slocum new england? Youd want to be as close to the equator as possible to gain the effects of the earths rotation. New england would be a terrible place. They are located in southern california currently I believe.
Kent Slocum
Kent Slocum Mês atrás
@Ddub1083 Astute observation. At the same time...the current version is not the final version. I'm sure the final version has to be remote, while also at a good latitude and longitude for rocket launchs and near the ocean for aborting launches. Does that put them in New England? I'm not well-informed enough to know.
Ddub1083 Mês atrás
@Kent Slocum they made a whole bunch of cgi for funding discussions and they wanted to show all the videos. haha Youll notice every time they show it flinging a payload there are trees all around it but the site they are at.... clearly no trees
Greg V.
Greg V. 15 dias atrás
Very nice video description and engineering application. Amazing solutions and innovations from smart engineers thinking outside the box. Very refreshing and inspiring. I'd be curious to know with current's material technology/properties, what the max teeter mass, rpm, and spin radius could be achieved. Also, at these momentum levels, is Spinlaunch concerned with any precession effects due to earth's rotation at the launch location site? I guess this is why one of the demo site had the spinning case tilted, to be aligned with earth's axis of rotation?
Frankie TheBull
Frankie TheBull Mês atrás
Imagine launching an ordinary missile from one of these. You would be able to extend the range of your current arsenal by thousands of miles. You could spin launch a surface to surface missile and not worry about adding fuel because once the missile leaves the atmosphere the engines don't have to push against air or humidity, thus extending the amount of time the engine runs and adding to it's range. Honestly I think since this is being tested next door to White Sands Missile Range I don't see why it couldn't happen.
life in general
life in general 25 dias atrás
This all makes perfect sense but what I can’t quite figure out right now is spinning something that weighs that much in a vacuum or otherwise and then instantly that that balance is gone so after the rocket is tossed how does it rebalance itself before it shakes itself to pieces because you can’t stop something with that much torque instantly.
Bei Zhang
Bei Zhang Mês atrás
6 Mach is no way near orbit. The strength needed is also proportional to the square of the launch speed. I don't know how this would work.
mturker100 Mês atrás
This was an impeccable documentary. No fat on it at all and explained exceptionally well.
KAI Watson
KAI Watson Mês atrás
how so 42 minutes is a lot!
I9387 B5742
I9387 B5742 Mês atrás
This is some wonderful engineering for all generations especially the younger generation. So much good things for the future! As Einstein said "“Imagination is everything. It is the preview of life’s coming attractions.”
PUSH Band Mês atrás
Seems like you could redirect the atmospheric pressure, so that it closes the door on it's self.
Muhamad Ridho Maulana Mustaqim
man, so futuristic! someone's going to make a weapon out of this for sure
Dennis Kapatos
Dennis Kapatos Mês atrás
This is fantastic content about a really interesting topic. Great job.
Roman R
Roman R Mês atrás
I do not think this is impossible, but I'm curious how they are going to deal with all those problems - one in particular I never heard answered is that g-loading is one thing, especially since g's are going to increase gradually as it spins up, but at the moment of launch payload would go from 10 000g to ~0g of ballistic trajectory in like a couple milliseconds. Wouldn't everything that is compressed like that just spring back up and destroy itself? That's something a centrifuge can't show you, as it will also have to spin down over time.
ego Mês atrás
@Arn_Thor imagine it’s like pressing a spring down with your finger and then suddenly letting go vs gradually let it go back to its original size.
Arn_Thor Mês atrás
I’m not physicist but I don’t imagine the removal of g forces acts the same way as the addition of g forces. I.e the material wouldn’t violently spring back, just naturally adjust in the absence of 10,000 g.
Mrdresden Mês atrás
Fantastic content, thank you for this! Hope they figure out how to make this work
eli goldman
eli goldman 26 dias atrás
I’d be interested from a mechanical standpoint how long a door operating at that force would last. It can’t last so long as the amount of sheer force it would experience would drastically reduce is life span of being property able to seal.
Marc McReynolds
Marc McReynolds 25 dias atrás
Aircraft parts which are subjected to loads far greater than that are generally good for between thousands and tens of thousands of cycles. The right sort of (replaceable) elastomer seal will go a long ways towards limiting peak loads.
I did a thing
I did a thing Mês atrás
Great video! Loved the format!
Smüth Opheliac
Smüth Opheliac 21 dia atrás
Yeah I liked the part when it did the spin, make a DIY version of this
Mosq ski
Mosq ski 22 dias atrás
garage-built 3d-printed rubber-coated hand-welded dyson-vacuumed pool-cleaner pump-powered magpie-loaded artisan spinlaunch when?
Mike Oxmall
Mike Oxmall 26 dias atrás
Can you make your own rocket yeeter?
loucry81 26 dias atrás
You should replicate spinlaunch with launching something else like waterballoons
MoringAfterStar Mês atrás
@Mika Hessling well you demonstrated you're the brains of this operation.
paulo sergio
paulo sergio Mês atrás
Why the possibility of launching projectile using magnetic tunneling has never being discussed?
davidbwa 28 dias atrás
I am still a bit skeptical they will overcome some of the hurdles mentioned but I lack the knowledge in the associated fields to say they won't (or will). But I appreciate how you made this video. It seems fairly well balanced addressing the concerns and negatives as well as the positive and thus avoiding just being a 'hype' video. I also greatly appreciated the clear, smooth editing style instead of "flashy", jerky stuff trying too hard to look cool. In other words, thank you for not being the video equivalent of 'jazz hands'. I hate it when some channels do that.
002 17 dias atrás
im just looking at all these novel launch systems and cant help but to think that the military would reeeeaaaaally like to get their hands on these once thei're fully developed. Great video as always brian
Zezinho Dutra Balio
Zezinho Dutra Balio 17 dias atrás
If you make the launch exit duct 5 times longer it would give you 5 times more flexible delay to seal back the chamber at lower cost, and you could use more single action doors, so some doors only opens and others only close...
Serge Frechette
Serge Frechette 26 dias atrás
I’m wondering ,if the spin propels the ballistic device , what if it was further aided by an electromagnetic booster of some kind. Anyhow this is fantastic . Makes one think of the possibilities of defeating costs of defeating gravity.
Reggie S Vincent
Reggie S Vincent Mês atrás
Hope they manage to overcome all the obstacles for this to become economical. Being able to send fuel up cheaply to an orbital refueling station would open up so many options for manned missions.
Yarpen Zigrin
Yarpen Zigrin 28 dias atrás
They won't. This doesn't work in atmosphere.
Nevir202 Mês atrás
@*Mute lol
*Mute Mês atrás
The main obstacle is Earth having atmosphere. I sure as hell hope they don't "overcome" its existence.
Jorge C. M.
Jorge C. M. Mês atrás
@Kiyoone "hahahaha HEENIEGA"
Nevir202 Mês atrás
@Codebreakerblue perhaps, but that would necessitate a larger chamber, which is a major issue, when as he said, lobbing the projectile uses less energy than the atmosphere extraction.
Driftingsiax 23 dias atrás
I absolutely love that the heart of this concept is “let’s just throw it.”
gz 7 dias atrás
let's throw it really really hard
Human Person
Human Person 15 dias atrás
I watched the first Space Shuttle launch considering it an unlikely assemblage. Though the design parameters are obviously very different, SpinLaunch gives me great confidence. It's an "engineering intellectual" achievement. Your answers are before you.
Kenneth Halverson
Kenneth Halverson Mês atrás
Use an electromagnetic sleeve after you launch it to grab onto it and help introduce it into the atmosphere atmosphere you probably get a boost as well
Impact Trauma
Impact Trauma 22 dias atrás
Any time I hear anything about SpinLaunch, I’m amazed it got this far, with all it’s shortcomings. 1. You can’t use it on anything living. 2. Anything launched has to be able to handle the high G forces and sudden change in forces, at launch. That means satellites have to be made extremely robust. …like building an airplane to the specifications of a battleship… 3. The launch vehicle will be extremely limiting, since it’s not scalable. If it doesn’t fit the launcher, it doesn’t fly. 4. There is no margin for error and no abort mode. If something breaks before launch velocity, you’d better pray it holds together long enough to stop the spin. If not, you get to watch the whole launcher explode in spectacular fashion. Those are just the most obvious problems…
Bear Rodriguez
Bear Rodriguez 20 dias atrás
yea man, the list is endless, i don't understand how anyone believes that spinlaunch is even viable as in idea.. let alone a concept or the terrifying thought of being actually conceived.. save the lives now, trashcan the project and stop scamming the investors lmao
Kenneth Christensen
Kenneth Christensen 22 dias atrás
They mite launch a steel ball bearing but the launch machine will tear itself apart when the launch takes place.
The BloodSwiper
The BloodSwiper Mês atrás
There should be "This is an 3D render" when animations are used and not tests.
lolrofl Mês atrás
If you're having trouble telling the difference you're probably in the wrong place.
Mike on the Bayou
Mike on the Bayou Mês atrás
It’s easy to see, the real ones tumble instead of flying straight.
Hippo Mês atrás
+1 the quality of renders is constantly improving on this channel, which I appreciate, but it also makes it less obvious what is real footage. Many cinema films already use renders for some parts/scenes and it is not noticeable anymore if properly done.
Marche Silvet
Marche Silvet Mês atrás
Yes, there should be, even if it's obvious. Some clips looks 'too good/futuristic' that I also wonder if they are 3d rendered. And there's also 'too good' renders that I thought they're true... Well, they can just put the "This is a 3d render" on renders irregardless of reason, removes unnecessary confusion.
LKNANML 20 dias atrás
I don't see this working out with Earth launches. I can't really think of an industry product that could deal with the launch parameters being financially stable. However this might be absolutely amazing based on the moon to send supplies to Mars or beyond. This is kind of like the spinning hubs put in different areas of space and you throw a payload from one to the other until it reaches its destination. This could do that with a sending station and a single stage rocket to slow it down at the other end. Just not seeing how this will work out in our atmosphere and be competitive in the market.
Kris tian
Kris tian Mês atrás
Could you have some type of mechanical latch that catch the "exit door", preventing it to "settle" when it closes. Or will the residiual vacuum in the chamber make sure that it remains closed instantly?
Richard Casto
Richard Casto Mês atrás
While that door was fast, as you note, it has significant bounce. It reminds me of firearm bolts that must close and lock into battery in a very short amount of time. I think there is a lot of room for optimization of that inner door. For example a sealing system that sits above the final position that captures, seals, moves with and helps decelerate the door as it settles into its final and locked position. Making the door as light as possible helps with acceleration and deceleration.
Max Krzyzanowski
Max Krzyzanowski 14 dias atrás
Phenomenal examination of this system. Many thanks.
Christian D'Abrera
Christian D'Abrera 6 dias atrás
I really liked this video but noticed that a discussion of failure modes and safety was conspicuously absent. What happens when their Mach 6 projectile fails to release at the right point? What happens if the airlock doors malfunction? How is safety of ground crew assured and damage to superstructure minimised? The concept definitely has legs but I worry that a catastrophic failure early on might spook investors.
Michael Imbesi
Michael Imbesi Mês atrás
I’m surprised that they didn’t just call a shipyard for the vacuum chamber. The double bottom tanks on ships are built to withstand more than 1 atm of pressure because of hydrostatic loads, and shipyards will have the experience, equipment, and workforce to easily and cheaply produce something like that.
Dave Fish
Dave Fish Mês atrás
@Lakin Moser yeah literally. The vacuum chamber needs to be built in situ. You can't practically and cheaply build something that big in a shipyeard and haul it into the desert. Easier to have the welders come to you.
K W Mês atrás
@Lakin Moser did you just gloss over my last comment?
K W Mês atrás
@Lakin Moser Vacuum is the difference between outside pressure and inside pressure. So technically, a submarine would be a vac chamber because it’s lower than the local exterior pressure. Outside in our atmosphere, anything less than 1 bar is considered a vacuum. Yes, the weight of the atmosphere is putting pressure on the outside of the chamber walls. You’re description isn’t wrong. Neither was mine.
Lakin Moser
Lakin Moser Mês atrás
@K W designing for vacuum simply means designing for pressure on the opposite side of whatever membrane is holding that vacuum. Vacuum exerts zero force on a container. The pressure outside of a vacuum container does.
Lakin Moser
Lakin Moser Mês atrás
@NBSV1 I’m well aware of that, but we’re talking about the Spin Launch launcher, which is a vessel that holds internal vacuum, ie external pressure. At absolutely no point in this discussion were internally pressurized volumes brought up, and they are completely irrelevant in context.
Solo Moto
Solo Moto Mês atrás
I'm surprised they don't use a spool of air tight sheeting in front of the launch opening that the projectile penetrates, and it could rapidly be pulled, partially sealing off the hole and minimizing air leaking in while the door closes.
Smitty Mês atrás
Be pulled...chances of it tearing. Partially closed isnt close to being enough.
LiteralSkosh Mês atrás
Don’t usually comment but you did an awesome job and I really enjoyed this video.
Happy Gilmore
Happy Gilmore Mês atrás
So cool! I wish these guys the best in their endeavors. This tech will benefit all of mankind
Robert Cook
Robert Cook Mês atrás
Happy Gilmore Yes, there's many issues to deal with but the knowledge gained will be good and who knows what will be discovered.........
Justin W
Justin W Mês atrás
You can increase various strengths in carbon fiber composites by adding in carbonized cellulose nanocrystals into the epoxy resin. CNC's are relatively easy and inexpensive to make in bulk, (and they have graphene like qualities when graphitized and carbon nanotube like properties when carbonized). The carbonization part is more energy intensive, but building vacuum insulated Solar concentrator ovens or the like, seems like it would be a cake walk for this team. Btw, a tip for getting high quality CNC material is to start off with a good raw material to begin with that is high in the crystalline cellulose. A lot of industry uses waste wood pulp which has low levels of this. But on the other hand, a lot of natural textile plant fibers we already use, such as flax, jute, hemp, cotton, etc are already pretty high in crystalline cellulose--usually anywhere from around 60 to 70 or so percent of total material. And you certainly can use waste sources of these. Oh, and since these materials are more thermally conductive than regular carbon and graphites, it would help with any potential overheating issues some by more rapidly dissipating and spreading out heat energy in the structure (if say the system malfunctioned and doors didn't close fast enough or what not).
Andrew Patterson
Andrew Patterson 23 dias atrás
Had this idea a couple of years ago ( except with an elevator mechanism, and the projectile launched in a vertical vacuum tube). Wonder if launching from a very tall mountain and spinning up the projectile like a football on launch would help with the initial shock of exiting the vacuum. You can see the rocket wobbling and losing tons of inertia as soon as it leaves the vacuum chamber.
Gabe C
Gabe C 17 dias atrás
Part of the problem is the speed they are launching at, as in it is too low. That wobbly launch was performed very close to mach 1, and transonic forces are notorious for creating these sort of unstable aerodynamic forces. The issue is somewhat self correcting due to the aerodynamic profile of the vessel, only resulting in a relatively minor loss of efficiency at initial launch.
S. Giles
S. Giles 25 dias atrás
Could a smaller version of this be mounted on an aircraft?
Johnny B
Johnny B 6 horas atrás
Great! Next thing to do is to try to put passangers in it :D
Adam Tehranchi
Adam Tehranchi 10 dias atrás
Sounds brilliant! For the atmosphere transition would a plasma window be viable? As for the counterweight problem would moving it towards the center of rotation work, or would it make the problem worse? Keep up the good work 👏🏻
Elke Ospert
Elke Ospert 4 dias atrás
The same centrifugal force which applies to the payload also applies to the counterweight. So you need a device which creates the the same amount of force just in the opposite direction to pull the counterweight to the center of rotation. But if you have a device which could create that amount of force to pull counterweight you could also use it directly to pull the payload (which has the same mass as the counterweight) into the direction you want to shoot it and the whole spinning wheel would be obsolete...
Greg Conquest - gc
Greg Conquest - gc Mês atrás
@18:54 When the secondary door closes, it appears to be a pressurized fabric, very much like a car airbag, which are also super fast in deployment. They would also release minimal air into the system. I guess once sealed, then the regular door can be more slowly slid into place. Interesting workaround for this problem.
Opmac Ace
Opmac Ace Mês atrás
@Hans Peter Geerdes true
Pete Fonseca
Pete Fonseca Mês atrás
To funny…it’s like watching a cartoon
Jari Mês atrás
I guess the rocket launch might be much easier at a higher altitude and not sea level launches - I would guess 5-6 km up at Atacama desert in chile would be ideal - maybe its cheaper to lauch from sea - dont know rather than doing from a mountain
Dirk Karmel
Dirk Karmel Mês atrás
btw While vacuum might be needed to increase velocities, nothing says: air exchange must use same system ! ?? Sample ?? -- Air is vacuumed, to pull the object -- Air is returned, to push the object
Dirk Karmel
Dirk Karmel Mês atrás
@Stefan Van pellicom Need to watch full video, to find their solution to this basic problem. Instead of opening against a vacuum, should consider opening thanks to the vacuum ! ??? Possible ??? 2 doors that lock while closed. -- When system is ballanced: 1st door CAN open, and 2nd door is locked. -- When system is fully unbalanced 1st door is locked, and 2nd door WILL be forced open. -- While 1st door needs to be solid, 2nd door can be temporary.
Postntalk Info
Postntalk Info Mês atrás
Throw Satellites to Space is a game where you launch satellites into space and try to hit targets on the earth below. It is a skill-based game that is easy to learn but difficult to master. Am I right?
Paul Thompson
Paul Thompson 28 dias atrás
This is great. I did some simple sketches for a vertical tube in the ocean that gets a rocket up to 422 miles per hour by the time it leaves the end. A giant piston would push the rocket upward. Solid rocket boosters could supply the tremendous volume and pressure needed to get 6G acceleration over 1000 feet length of tube.
Street Skater 66
Street Skater 66 26 dias atrás
Leonard Snebold
Leonard Snebold Mês atrás
That problem of eliminating the weight of the rocket fuel to make launching payloads into space I have been thinking about for quite a while now. And I came up with the idea of making a several mile long electro- magnetic rail inside a large vacuum tube. That would get a payload going at supersonic speed before it even leaves the ground. .And have the end of the rail gradually head vertically.
T Mês atrás
What an fascinating concept. It reminds me of a TED talk on launching satellites from a gas gun - the part that really stuck out to me there is that it's remarkably easy to build high g tolerant electronics. In fact that shouldn't be a surprise as artillery shells have had electronics since WWII proximity fuses and modern surface mount electronis should be a lot more high g tolerant than the WW2 era vacuum tubes equivalents. E.g. an M982 Excalibur round has GPS, INS and fins that deploy and steer for a glide. The gas gun guys reckoned you only needed some epoxy on the sharp corners of surface mounted components, i.e. it was a problem with well known solutions.
David Seal
David Seal Mês atrás
See the movie " doomsday gun" 1994....
Skyeline Mês atrás
I will admit, this video answered my questions about the door mechanism (which was only a membrane before). Many other aspects of the system are clearly feasible, such as the low atmosphere vessel, and energy requirements. However, I do not feel like the enough information was given on how the vehicle/payload would deal with high shock events, and they are clearly hiding their release mechanism design. And yes, that release mechanism will be proprietary, but it should be the biggest concern for potential investors, as the loads it must endure are very high and it must release the vehicle in nearly an instant without imparting any significant torque. I still don't believe the project can scale up, but I will be happy to be proven wrong, if they can pull it off.
arfink Mês atrás
@Peter Samuelson those tail vanes slamming into air at hypersonic velocity should help impart the required torque.
Polygon Tower
Polygon Tower Mês atrás
@AnyBodyWannaPeanut Someone is wrong here The past tense of steal is stole not stolen and the past participle is stolen
Peter Samuelson
Peter Samuelson Mês atrás
No significant torque? Depends how you define significant, I guess. The object at release time has angular momentum of 450 RPM. If the release mechanism doesn't impart an _enormous_ torque as it releases, the rocket will tumble at 450 RPM, or 7.5 end-over-end rotations per second. So, yeah. Within a fraction of a second at launch time, it will have to go from 450 RPM to zero angular momentum, somehow. Stopping something from spinning 450 RPM isn't that bad ... but this has to happen in a very short span of time and distance.
Ethan Norton
Ethan Norton Mês atrás
@Logarithm If you're spinning up the small rocket to mach 6 and getting it to 72 km you're already 72% of the way to space and only using $500k to get there the rocket would have to be tiny even to get something to arount 160 km. The cost of using a 747 to get to only 15% of the way and dropping the rocket moving at only around 490 knots (.89 mach) and accelerating from there is much more expensive. For refrence the speed needed for a stable low earth orbit is mach 20. The 747's hourly operating cost is around $26k per hour (source plus up front costs for the plane plus launch vehicle costs. Spin launch would be astronomically cheaper due to minimal launch vehicle cost and a few million dollars for a mach 6 vaccumized centrifuge. Edit: virgin orbit's launcher one is planned to be $12 million dollars per launch. The cost of the centrifuge will likely be around that as an up front cost plus $500k per spin. The boeing 747 costs $20 million plus the 12 for launcher one.
Garrett Kajmowicz
Garrett Kajmowicz Mês atrás
G-forces are weird. Depending upon the deformation of an object it can experience 10,000 gs simply from falling a few feet and hitting a hard rigid surface. There's a bunch of math to do here, but I think it's far less worrisome than most people exist. The big problem with gs is for people. Meat puppets don't like high acceleration forces.
Flying Pictures
Flying Pictures Mês atrás
Totally! To quote the vernacular. I think its just incredible and will enable an enormous range of satellite applications to become viable. Its very exciting.
R1PPA-C-Official Mês atrás
Brilliant format Documentary... I often find myself skipping parts of documentary or anything I watch as I'm usually short of time and know what's even spoken about.. But not this time.. Really good video boys Subbed 💪🏻
Steve S
Steve S Mês atrás
This is a really great idea, however with SpaceX and their reusable rockets, the costs of rocket launches are already dramatically lower. Take in to account the new Starship and you essentially have a very very small niche for SpinLaunch
Steve H
Steve H Mês atrás
The point of this is mostly to reduce fuel usage (and emissions in the lower atmosphere) by eliminating the first stage of a traditional rocket launch. This also isn’t intended for human transportation.
Mom Amanda
Mom Amanda Mês atrás
Just throw a rocket from planet to planet lol But seriously tho, this is awesome stuff! I really hope their work pays off and they will be successful with their goals! There might be problems in their way, but problems are meant to be solved, not thought of being impossible
Oncorhynchus nerka
Oncorhynchus nerka Mês atrás
There has to be an error in the altitude vs time graph at 32:16… they’re going at Mach 6 (i.e. 2 km/s at MSL), yet you have them riding up to nearly 80 km of altitude in just 1 second. At that point you’ve got an interplanetary mass driver on your hands
A. Clifton
A. Clifton 19 dias atrás
They're definitely not hitting mach 6 lmao
Drakthar Mês atrás
True, if that was actually in seconds, the launch would happen at 80 km/s, which is insane.
Canaan Winthrop
Canaan Winthrop Mês atrás
Massive errors are fine. This isn’t rocket science…
Bert Veening
Bert Veening Mês atrás
@James Jeffrey "maybe we can use the launcher to shoot spent nuclear fuel pellets into the sun giving our solar system more fuel to say thanks." One "small" problem with that, the sun is powered by fusion, not fission so those spent nuclear fuel pellets will have a negative impact on the sun's fuel situation.
Peter Demkiw
Peter Demkiw Mês atrás
That's not true, please go and watch the video he did on the mars helicopter, he never said it wouldn't work, get your fact correct.
Simon Hansen
Simon Hansen 22 dias atrás
If I recall correctly, Canada was given a US Navy 16 inch gun, they used this to send a 20 kilo sabot round into low earth orbit. The same issues of a payload that could survive the g-forces existed 60 years ago. The big gun reduced the launch cost to a few bags of gunpowder.
Derino Mês atrás
i wonder how many scientists building this have "Spin Eternally" playing in their heads whenever the prototype launches
Matthew Watt
Matthew Watt 14 dias atrás
I really worry for those thick CFRP sections. It's true it can support the tensile strength in theory, but the failure mechanisms of composites are far more complicated than an isotropic metallic. A section this thick must have good enough consolidation otherwise it'll simply delaminate at these loads. I hope they've done some SERIOUS testing account for all mechanisms.
Filip Višnić
Filip Višnić 6 dias atrás
This is great. It could be used for launcing nuclear waste into a Sun since using fuel rockets is too expensive for that.
Elke Ospert
Elke Ospert 4 dias atrás
It could not even lllauch a very small satellite into an low orbit without using a additional rocket. And if anything goes wrong in the launch (the payload is released one millisecond to early) you would throw radioactive waste to the earth.
riccardo riganti
riccardo riganti Mês atrás
You should make the same kind of documentaries with nuclear startups like nuscale and others!
Benjamin Berger
Benjamin Berger Mês atrás
@Real Engineering YES!!!!!!!!! Helion ftw!
Chapter 4 Travels
Chapter 4 Travels Mês atrás
Agreed, but not NuScale, it's just a tiny PWR and will have no impact on global energy. A much better model would be MSRs, both in the thermal and fast spectrum. Thorcon Power and Elysium Industries come to mind.
BigMo Mês atrás
@Real Engineering hope your addressing the use of Helium 3, extremely rare, some say isn’t a renewable gas.
Aitesedba Mês atrás
That sounds legitimately interesting!
riccardo riganti
riccardo riganti Mês atrás
@Real Engineering it would be great to do the same with fission startups
Trevor van Bremen
Trevor van Bremen Mês atrás
I'm wondering whether the 'spin launch' concept ends up making good use of the 'launch from a mountain top' concept (a.k.a. raising the launch altitude) in order to minimize the amount of time spent in the higher density / pressure lower altitudes. (It's never been significant for 'traditional' rocketry, but perhaps it becomes more significant when there's no thrust provided for the first few dozen kilometers)
bikerdude923 Mês atrás
If I remember correctly their launch facility is in NM which already sits at an altitude of 3-6k feet above MSL, which would be about 2-3psi lower pressure than at sea level and if they built it on top of a 14000 foot peak in CO that would lower the pressure an additional 4psi for a total of 6-8 psi lower than MSL so mathematically it might make a difference. However traveling a their projected Mach 6 launch speed and ignoring velocity loss for a moment and assuming that the launch site is at 5k ft MSL the projectile would traverse that difference in altitude in about a second (Mach 6 = 6750ft/sec) going straight up (I assume vertical launch because with system like this you aren't gaining velocity as you climb unlike a traditional rocket that has to reach escape velocity and therefore has to angle its trajectory to gain enough distance to accelerate up to speed, but I'm not a rocket surgeon so not sure about my SWAG there). So again maybe it makes a small difference in efficiency to launch from a higher alt. but there is also the feasibility issue of trying to build something on top of a mtn and I would hazard a guess that the gains from launching at alt. compared to the cost of trying to build and operate a facility at alt. make the idea impractical, we're talking marginal gains for exponentially higher costs.
Dave Graham
Dave Graham Mês atrás
So how would a payload consisting of electronics and possible optics survive the spin-up? The G-forces it wold experience would be HUGE... Interesting concept, but I also don't see how you could insert the payload into orbit with a trajectory straight up ?!
T BYRD 11 dias atrás
@Garry Jones Even 8-10Gs would be at least realistic since planes do that now, but satellites and people are usually are more delicate so 4 Gs to 6 Gs would be better.
Garry Jones
Garry Jones 13 dias atrás
I'm sorry but this falls in the category of stupid ideas that shouldn't be engineered. It is simply not practical! On the other hand Maglev long ramps miles long are more promising keeping G force at near 1 G!
Nadeem Ahmed
Nadeem Ahmed 16 dias atrás
They literally tested your hypothesis in the video finish watching it
Bert Veening
Bert Veening Mês atrás
"I also don't see how you could insert the payload into orbit with a trajectory straight up ?!" It already starts with rotational spin of the earth and that small rocket doesn't have to point straight down. It is launched more or less vertically for the very same reason all launches to orbit start vertically, to get through the thickest part of the atmosphere as quickly as possible.
Anonymous 1
Anonymous 1 Mês atrás
^^ My first thought when I heard about this a couple years ago. Great if we want to launch rocks into orbit, but something like 10000 g's on a satellite let alone a rocket with plumbing and rocket fuel. Not realistic. They would be better off with a linear launcher 5 miles long.
Ronald Njiswe
Ronald Njiswe 20 dias atrás
Going for my first year in Aircraft and rocket engines design. I always find your videos helpful and inspiring and im constantly motivated to become an innovative engineer. Thank you Brian!
That would be crazy if it ends up working. Just throw satellites into orbit. I know that the main point is to throw it as high as it can then let a rocket take over using a lot less fuel but imagine if they didn't need a rocket at all. Just throw it into orbit haha
Liam Mês atrás
I wonder if balance can be addressed by shifting counterweights? outward on the launch side, inward on the far side.
g heart
g heart 25 dias atrás
You should engineer a zep covered in solar for motors etc. Build a J cell for hydrogen lift n boom, your floating infinitely. Hydrogen implodes, so not covering the zep in flammable paint, it should be fairly safe with the new lightning tecth. Dehumidifier system for water. You should build it!! Nice vid, thanks!
Garry Jones
Garry Jones 13 dias atrás
The Gforces while spinning and launching are way beyond humans and most cargo could withstand! It is like shooting people down a short gun barrel but shaking it pretty good before going Bang!😮
Erik van Rijn
Erik van Rijn 29 dias atrás
I've been following SpinLaunch with great interest and a fair bit of scepticism. Great video!
Mikael N
Mikael N 27 dias atrás
this tech is so wrong
Chris Evil
Chris Evil Mês atrás
an orbital YEET launch system is probably the coolest thing i've heard yet. hopefully they're able to overcome the many barriers to space flight and become a viable solution.
Yarpen Zigrin
Yarpen Zigrin 28 dias atrás
They won't.
Gangfire Mês atrás
Very cool, but for me a thunderwell is cooler.
Chad King87
Chad King87 Mês atrás
@Kodfk Dleepd give me money poor man
Kodfk Dleepd
Kodfk Dleepd Mês atrás
@Yuuto Nosuri Yes, always give billionaires your money, they need it real bad! They are suffering because they lack the ability to do great things. Please give at least 10% of your money to the next billionaire so he can help save humanity! They work really hard, like about 39843 hours a week typically so deserve more money to help them be happy.
Yuuto Nosuri
Yuuto Nosuri Mês atrás
@Kodfk Dleepd just ask a billionaire lol
luc1d 5 dias atrás
Best video I've seen on spinlaunch so far. Good job
Kevin Stewart
Kevin Stewart Mês atrás
My question since I first heard of this, given all the technical challenges with creating such a vacuum, and such, would it not solve many issues if you could mount this on a 20000 foot mountain?
Kevin Stewart
Kevin Stewart 17 dias atrás
@Friday Californiaa fair enough that that would be a challenge. Of course they would probably have to wade through international politics and paperwork to get a good location to. But if they could do it, it seems like a solution to many of the other challenges
Friday Californiaa
Friday Californiaa 29 dias atrás
The thing is that they would have to ship all the facilities to a high altitude place, and I guess that doesn't make the project really cheap enough.
BGS Member
BGS Member Mês atrás
I actually thought of a similar concept over 20 years ago, except using it in space (near zero g's). You could use solar power and/or ion engines, and take advantage of centrifugal force (zero friction) in space to gradually accelerate a payload, then slingshot it.
BGS Member
BGS Member 21 dia atrás
@Cynthetic Yes, of course it would. But there's more to it than I revealed. I could give up the secret sauce to how it would work, but there's nothing in it for me and so why bother. We live in oligarchical/communist society where individuals aren't rewarded with much more than table scraps, and I'd rather take my ideas to the grave than make someone else rich.
Cynthetic 21 dia atrás
Wouldn't that spin itself? Newton's first law, unless the spinlauncher is massive which would be expensive
Karma Mechanic
Karma Mechanic 16 dias atrás
How does it handle the sudden severe imbalance in the rotating arm when the vehicle is released? Not to mention the shock of the atmosphere rushing in to disturb things even more. I don't understand how this would not tear itself apart. Martin Savage used to talk about building a mass driver on Kilimanjaro. Something like this on Kilimanjaro would already be past half of the atmosphere. Much less initial velocity would be required. Interesting concept but hard to imagine how it will ever be used in practice. Especially with the cost of payload going down with Starship when it comes online.
TpzBla Mês atrás
Overall I'm skeptical, but its very impressive what they say they've accomplished, and it seems a simpler system than what it would seem other wise. Best of luck to them.
13th Raven Purple
13th Raven Purple Mês atrás
Great work 🥳 Thank youuu 💜
The Problem with Solar Energy in Africa
What Is Beyond The Edge?
Visualizações 51 000
Storing Solar Power on my ROOF!!!
Visualizações 2 900 000
The Insane Engineering of the GEnX
Visualizações 3 600 000
The 4 things it takes to be an expert
Visualizações 6 400 000
Will Boom Bring Supersonic Back?
Visualizações 695 000
The Insane Engineering of the Thunderscreech
The Problem with the Next Moon Mission
Rei das cantadas pt 1
Visualizações 571 620
Mãe TÓXICA passou dos limites
Visualizações 103 964
Visualizações 132 561
worth losing weight?😩
Visualizações 3 922 186
O que VAI ACONTECER em 72H com VC?😱🚨